Surrey county is undertaken several consultations and it is seeking your views by 4 January 2019 to help it shape the special educational needs and disability (Send) services throughout Surrey for the future
Surrey says that its draft strategy includes proposals for giving support as early as possible, which would be better for those who need help. The aim is also to provide support nearer to home and reduce the need for children to go to schools out of the county. To achieve this an extra 350 specialist school places are planned to be created in Surrey over the next two years. Surrey believes that, overall, the changes will mean better outcomes for children and families and with government funding failing to keep pace with the big increase in children needing help, they may also avoid more costly services being needed in the future.
Further details on all the consultations and the opportunity to submit views on these proposals can be found here. The consultation response is at the bottom of the consultation webpage.
The analysis of the responses to the consultations will be presented to Surrey’s cabinet in January 2019 for consideration and then to full council in February. There will then be a second phase of consultation where we will share detailed proposals in 2019 to seek resident’s views before any final decisions are made.
Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race. H G. Wells
Cllr John O’Reilly, who represents Hersham at Surrey and is also the chair of Surrey Elmbridge Local Committee, is known as a cyclist and is keen to make cycling safer in Elmbridge. To do so, would require a vision of what we would want to achieve over time and a strategy to get us there.
The Liberal Democrats in Elmbridge want to pursue the the aim of making cycling safer to reduce air pollution, congestion and to help people become healthier. Cycling also supports the local retail economy and makes our towns and villages stronger communities through the increase in serendipitous meetings.
Vision An Elmbridge of physically, mentally and spiritually healthy people of all ages enjoying fresh air and a high quality of life.
Mission To enable all the people of Elmbridge – who wish to do so – to cycle safely.
To achieve our mission our strategy is based on our being:
- Utilitarian. We focus on a person’s ability to cycle from home to the key places that make their life work: their school or workplace, their station, their town centre. Therefore routes to these places are dealt with first.
- Network based. We understand that the benefits are far greater if networks are created. It is little use to have a safe stretch that suddenly ends in a dangerous spot – like Blundel Lane Bridge
- Inclusive. We bring as many agencies, organisations and groups and people together to compound the benefits and spread the message.
- Incremental. Although we have a clear and ambitious vision we know that many small steps made by many people eases the journey
- Anticipatory. We take advantage of possible opportunities that might arise by anticipating requirements before they occur
- Communicative. We engage with everyone and keep them informed
- Sustainable. We strive to be socially and environmentally sustainable in everything that we do.
What would you like to see in a cycling strategy?
The Dutch and Danes developed a comprehensive approach over many decades. A good place to begin is to help secondary students below the age of seventeen to feel safe enough (along with their parents) to cycle to school. Yet on cycling out of Reeds School there is little evidence that cycling is a serious possibility. Everything else being equal student who cycle achieve more than those who are driven to school.
When we see most parents cycling with their children to primary school rather than driving – like the Dutch and Danes – then we will know we’d have cracked it. It is much quicker to cycle than walk – although walking can be fun too.
We have been promoting a cycleway through Weybridge for a number of years and despite many setbacks, practical steps are now being made. The cycleway will link Byfleet to Weybridge and pass by M&S, Tescos, The Heights, The London and Brooklands Museum, Brooklands College, Heathside School, St George’s School, the station and the town centre, The cycleway is in three parts:
- The southern end meets the Byfleet cycleway at the Elmbridge/Woking border at Brooklands and passes through the park, past the Brooklands museum, alongside the railway to the station. It is proposed that the section from the Mercedes Benz world and the Heights to the station will be well lit.
- The middle part will travel parallel to Heath Road and via an upgraded Springrose path and Springfield Lane to Monument Green
- The northern part will link Monument Green with the Thames Pathway and Wey Navigation Path
The southern section is being developed first. This and the middle section require access to common land and therefore, subject to public consultation which ends on 27 November, the permission of the Secretary of State. The Elmbridge Countryside Consultative Group has already endorsed the scheme.
Alongside this various land permissions and cycle orders are required to accompany the business case the Elmbridge and Surrey have to make to unlock the allocated local enterprise partnership funding for the project.
The aim is to finalise the project’s business case in December 2017 in order to submit the application in January 2018 for opening in 2019/20.
The Grotto Road, Thames Street junction in Weybridge is notorious for road danger – the pedestrian risk and traffic around school times is horrendous. What makes it really dangerous is that there is no footpath by the fence in Grotto Road. Many primary age children walk by themselves or with their parents either alongside the fence in the traffic or have to cross Grotto Road twice to get to school.
So, what can be done about it?
Cllr Andrew Davis lobbied Surrey county to build a path – with an estimated cost somewhere between £20,000 to £60,000 but Surrey hasn’t the money. However, Weybridge has. Weybridge councillors have £500,000 to spend on such projects. All okay then? Well, actually . . . No!
Here is the bizarre thing. Any such project has to have a feasibility study, but Weybridge’s £500,000 may not be spent on such studies. And Surrey cannot even afford the study to demonstrate the cost effectiveness and benefit of the project!
Fortunately, Cllr Davis has managed to get Surrey to consider making a bid to Weybridge councillors to pay for the project, based on the upper estimate of £60,000, if the project is shown to have a good level of local support.
The Weybridge Liberal Democrat team have set up a survey to canvass support from local people who are concerned about the danger of this junction.
Weybridge residents, find out more and add your support here and watch this space for updates.
Surrey’s Conservative Leader, David Hodge, when giving evidence about 20mph speed limits to a House of Commons Select Committee in 2014 said: “The problem is that it is all very well putting in a 20mph limit, but unless somebody is going to enforce it you have wasted a whole lot of money. My view is that I have no intention of wasting public money putting in 20mph limits.”
John Furey, Surrey’s portfolio holder for transport told me that he had no mind to implement 20mph limits because it hindered people’s business and he wanted growth for Surrey. But this view does not bear scrutiny.
Let’s do a quick calculation. Most car journeys are under five miles long. They usually begin on a side street, pass along a few main roads and end on a side street. Let’s assume that the journey is 5 miles long – 4.6 miles on main roads and 0.4 miles on the two sides streets at each end. Let us also assume that the driver can drive at the maximum speed along the whole journey – hardly likely during the day (even at night either) – no stopping to give way at junctions, no traffic lights, no zebra crossings and no congestion. At 30mph the journey would take ten minutes door-to door. Given that the maximum speeds in the side streets would be 20mph – the journey in such a case would be 10.4 minutes door-to door. The difference is 24 seconds. In other words, the journey would take 4% longer. The longer the journey the proportionally smaller the time difference. During the middle of the day the difference would be too small to notice. Yet for the sake of a few seconds lives are lost and injuries greater.
But the 20mph limit on side streets makes a greater difference. Surveys across the country have shown that mothers will cycle if the streets are seen to be safe and, more importantly, they will let their children cycle too. In general mothers have more influence on their children cycling than fathers. The greater the switch to cycling the lower the air pollution, the more pleasant the environment, and the healthier the people.
Given that between the ages of 5 and 40 the greatest single cause of death in Britain is being killed by a moving vehicle (whether driving it, being a passenger or being a passerby) it is important to reduce this loss of life. Enforcing a 20mph speed limit on side streets would be the single most effective way for the police service to protect us.
Currently the cost of 20mph limits is a small 20mph roundel on every other lamppost.
The Weybridge cycling campaign welcomes the move to set Weybridge as the town in Elmbridge to begin the new cycling strategy. This five year strategy looks to the present and future needs of the town in planning new facilities for cyclists. The main trust will be to plan for a network of safe cycling routes between Weybridge and its neighbours (Shepperton, Walton, Hersham, Cobham, Byfleet, Woodham and Addlestone) especially in relation to the main locations in Weybridge: the riverside, town centre, Heathside School/Brooklands College (along with the primary schools), station, Brooklands offices and out-of-town shopping.
The aim is for safe cycling between all of these locations. Our aim is to catch up with the Netherlands. They began a while ago but look at this video to see how they managed the change.
For a background on why 20mph is so important see here.
The Surrey Liberal Democrats are calling on the Surrey administration to provide the necessary funding to implement 20 mph speed limits outside Surrey schools where requested by the school and the local community.
Introducing a 20mph limit on all our streets is probably the most important way of improving our health and quality of life. Even more cost effective than spending more on NHS England! The reason is simple. If speeds on the streets are less than 20mph cycling and walking increases and as more people cycle and walk their life expectancy improves by six years on average. Not only do people live longer but their quality of life improvise too. All this can be done by a simple change in the speed limit law.
It is of upmost importance that children are safe going to and from school and 20 mph speed limits outside schools help to achieve this by reducing traffic speeds and improving road safety. A reduced speed limit warns drivers that they need to slow down near a school and in general drivers do slow down.
In Mole Valley, Surrey introduced three trial 20 mph advisory limits outside schools and following the trial the 20 mph advisory limits were made permanent. However, whilst making these trial 20 mph limits permanent, Surrey also decided not to roll-out the trial to cover the roads outside other schools in the district.
Disadvantaged primary school pupils in Surrey are set to receive £28.6 million to boost attainment, the Liberal Democrats have announced.
The Pupil Premium funding for 2015/16 will help teachers to support those children at most risk of falling behind their colleagues. It means primary schools will receive £1,320 for every school pupil who has registered for free school meals at any time in the last six years.
Evidence shows that raising the attainment of pupils by the end of primary school has a direct impact on future exam results.
The pupil premium will get extra money to schools in Surrey,targeted at the children who need it most. The whole class benefits when fewer children are struggling.
Brooklands College is a further and higher education college located in our town. It is one of Surrey’s largest providers of vocational training and further and higher education. Its course offering is diverse, with students travelling long distances to benefit from the Brooklands College experience. The students leave with qualifications and skills that stand them in good stead for a place at university, a job or further professional or vocational studies to enhance their careers.
The college seeks to recruit associate and full governors to its governing body.
If you would be interested in bringing your community, business or professional experience to the college to help us in our work, the college would be pleased to hear from you. It is seeking governors with general skills and also have particular need for new governors with a strong financial or audit background, and governors with previous experience in further and higher education.
Please click here to download the leaflet and information pack about the college and the role of governor.
To apply please refer to the background provided in the information pack and send a letter of application and curriculum vitae to reach Ian Pocock, Clerk to the Governing Body, by Monday 23 February 2015.
Shortlisting will take place during the week beginning 23 February 2015 and interviews will take place on 11 March 2015.
Conservatives will cut the education budget by £253 million in Surrey by 2020 if they were in national government on their own, official research shows.
The Tories would be forced to slash local spending on schools,colleges, and nurseries to keep pace with George Osborne’s plan to drastically reduce spending.
The research, based on official House of Commons library figures, shows schools will bear the brunt of Conservative cuts but childcare, college and early years budgets would also be hit hard.
Unlike both Labour and the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats are committed to protecting cradle to college education spending.